STOCKPORT COUNTY COURTS
'I'VE HEARD YOU DOOR HAS BEEN THERE SINCE
THE WAR? (Judge? Susan Jones, 11 May 2010)
'I'VE HEARD YOU DOOR HAS BEEN THERE SINCE
THE WAR? (Judge? Susan Jones, 11 May 2010)
MY DAUGHTER AND I WERE RESPONSIBLE FOR GETTING STOCKPORT COURTS MOVED
FROM 'HERON HOUSE' TO A DECENT BUILDING. BUT STILL WE HAVE HAD NO 'JUSTICE' AS
WE HAVE BEEN UNABLE TO OBTAIN A DECENT SOLICITOR OR EVEN LEGAL ADVICE, SINCE
WE HAD TO 'DISMISS' OUR LAST ONE IN MARCH 2011. - (NOTE: It's 'EASY GO CT'. But the
Courts put 'CY'. They could not even get the name of the Bus Company right? I told Court Officials it's 'T' for
Transport. But they refused to change it? This is the Justice System. Also BOTH Companies were owned and
funded by Stockport Council.
FROM 'HERON HOUSE' TO A DECENT BUILDING. BUT STILL WE HAVE HAD NO 'JUSTICE' AS
WE HAVE BEEN UNABLE TO OBTAIN A DECENT SOLICITOR OR EVEN LEGAL ADVICE, SINCE
WE HAD TO 'DISMISS' OUR LAST ONE IN MARCH 2011. - (NOTE: It's 'EASY GO CT'. But the
Courts put 'CY'. They could not even get the name of the Bus Company right? I told Court Officials it's 'T' for
Transport. But they refused to change it? This is the Justice System. Also BOTH Companies were owned and
funded by Stockport Council.
SOME OF THE PAPERS SERVED ON STOCKPORT COURTS
DATE OF HEARING: 11 MAY 2010.
DATE OF HEARING: 11 MAY 2010.
HE SHOULD HAVE TICKED 'YES' REGARDING ISSUES UNDER 'HUMAN RIGHTS ACT'.'
THE JUDGE ( WHO WAS NOT A REAL JUDGE ) AWARDED US £115.15 PAID AFTER MUM DIED ? WHICH SHE KNEW WE HAD REFUSED FOR THAT REASON ? SHE ALSO KNEW WE HAD PAID OUT £4,000 FOR SECURITY AFTER SEVERAL MORE BREAK-INS LINKED TO THE BUS COMPANY, AND £150 FOR COURT FEE ?
THE CASE WAS TRANSFERRED TO MANCHESTER COUNTY COURTS FOR A 'PERMISSION TO APPEAL' HEARING? BELIEVE IT OR NOT THIS CASE WENT THROUGH 'SEVEN JUDGES' AND TOOK 'SIXTEEN MONTHS' OF UNBELIEVABLE STRESS, DURING WHICH I WAS TAKEN TO HOSPITAL ? ALL FOR A SMALL CLAIM OF £1, 280 WHICH WAS REDUCED TO £895 FOR APPEAL AT MANCHESTER ? - AND STILL THEY ALL CARRIED ON WITH THIS 'CHARADE' IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE 'SOLICITORS'. - TAKING MY MONEY AND KNOWING FULL WELL IT WAS All A 'FORGONE CONCLUSION ?
THE JUDGES WERE - JUDGE DIGNAN, JUDGE OLLERENSHAWE, JUDGE CLEGG, JUDGE CULLETON, JUDGE SUSAN JONES? AT STOCKPORT COUNTY COURT IN THAT ORDER. THEN AT MANCHESTER COUNTY COURT - JUDGE PLATT AND JUDGE HOLMAN. - THE CASE LATER TRANSFERRED TO THE 'HIGH COURT' AS 'A COMPLAINT AGAINST 'A JUDGE' ?
AFTER WE OBTAINED THE TRANSCRIPT'S. BUT AS WE WERE UNABLE TO OBTAIN ANOTHER SOLICITOR THEY THREW IT BACK AT US (TWICE) - AS THEY DO NOT DO COMPLAINTS AGAINST JUDGES ? AND THEY WERE AWARE SUSAN JONES WAS NOT A JUDGE, BUT JUST A SOLICITOR FROM SK6 ? ............. AND YOU THINK WE HAVE A JUSTICE SYSTEM .............? THINK AGAIN!
THE CASE WAS TRANSFERRED TO MANCHESTER COUNTY COURTS FOR A 'PERMISSION TO APPEAL' HEARING? BELIEVE IT OR NOT THIS CASE WENT THROUGH 'SEVEN JUDGES' AND TOOK 'SIXTEEN MONTHS' OF UNBELIEVABLE STRESS, DURING WHICH I WAS TAKEN TO HOSPITAL ? ALL FOR A SMALL CLAIM OF £1, 280 WHICH WAS REDUCED TO £895 FOR APPEAL AT MANCHESTER ? - AND STILL THEY ALL CARRIED ON WITH THIS 'CHARADE' IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE 'SOLICITORS'. - TAKING MY MONEY AND KNOWING FULL WELL IT WAS All A 'FORGONE CONCLUSION ?
THE JUDGES WERE - JUDGE DIGNAN, JUDGE OLLERENSHAWE, JUDGE CLEGG, JUDGE CULLETON, JUDGE SUSAN JONES? AT STOCKPORT COUNTY COURT IN THAT ORDER. THEN AT MANCHESTER COUNTY COURT - JUDGE PLATT AND JUDGE HOLMAN. - THE CASE LATER TRANSFERRED TO THE 'HIGH COURT' AS 'A COMPLAINT AGAINST 'A JUDGE' ?
AFTER WE OBTAINED THE TRANSCRIPT'S. BUT AS WE WERE UNABLE TO OBTAIN ANOTHER SOLICITOR THEY THREW IT BACK AT US (TWICE) - AS THEY DO NOT DO COMPLAINTS AGAINST JUDGES ? AND THEY WERE AWARE SUSAN JONES WAS NOT A JUDGE, BUT JUST A SOLICITOR FROM SK6 ? ............. AND YOU THINK WE HAVE A JUSTICE SYSTEM .............? THINK AGAIN!
THE CLERK OF COURT INTERRUPTED, AND SAID 'THIS IS JUDGE HOLMAN' ?